Praise be to Allaah.
The scholars call this issue “the issue of settling scores”,
concerning which there is a dispute among the scholars. Some of them say
that it is not allowed to take what one is entitled to from a wrongdoer, and
some say that it is allowed subject to the condition that he does not take
more than he is entitled to and that there is no risk of being found out and
punished. The latter is the correct view.
Shaykh al-Shanqeeti (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:
If someone wrongs you and takes something of yours in an
unlawful manner, and you cannot prove it, but you are able to do something
similar to the way in which he wronged you, with no risk of being found out
or punished, do you have the right to take what you are entitled to or not?
The more correct of the two scholarly opinions, and the one
which seems closest to the apparent meaning of the texts and is based on the
more sound analogy, is that you may take that to which you are entitled, and
no more, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“then punish them with the like of that with which you
were afflicted”
[al-Nahl 16:126]
“Then whoever transgresses the prohibition against you,
you transgress likewise against him”
[al-Baqarah 2:194]
Among the scholars who were of this view are: Ibn Sireen,
Ibraaheem al-Nakha’i, Sufyaan and others.
A number of scholars – including Maalik – said that this was
not permitted. This is the view of Khaleel ibn Ishaaq al-Maaliki in his
Mukhtasar, where he said concerning goods placed with a person for
safekeeping: He does not have the right to take anything from them because
that person wronged him. Those who held this view quoted as evidence the
hadeeth: “Render back trusts to the one who entrusted it to you, and do not
betray the one who betrays you.”
This hadeeth – even if we assume that it is saheeh – cannot
be taken as evidence in this context, because the one who takes as much as
he is entitled to, and no more, is not betraying the one who betrayed him,
rather he is settling the score fairly with the one who wronged him.
Adwa’ al-Bayaan, 3/353
This is also the view of al-Bukhaari and al-Shaafa’i, as
narrated by Abu Zar’ah al-‘Iraaqi in Tarh al-Tathreeb, 8/226.
Al-Tirmidh narrated that it was the view of some of the Taabi’een, among
whom he mentioned Sufyaan al-Thawri.
The hadeeth quoted by those who do not allow it is the
hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah who said: The Prophet (S) said: “Render back trusts
to the one who entrusted it to you, and do not betray the one who betrays
you.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi, 1264; Abu Dawood, 3535; classed as saheeh by
al-Albaani in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah, 423.
So you can take what you
are entitled to from this Jew who owns the workplace, provided that you do
not take more than what you are entitled to, and provided that there is no
risk of being found out, which may damage the image of Islam, because you
cannot prove your rights to people. If he gives you what you are entitled to
after that, in whole or in part, then you have to return what you took from
him that is surplus to what you are entitled to.
And Allaah knows best.